AI chatbots trained to be warm and friendly when interacting with users may also be more prone to inaccuracies, new research suggests. Oxford Internet Institute (OII) researchers analysed more than 400,000 responses from five AI systems which had been tweaked to communicate in a more empathetic way. Friendlier answers contained more mistakes - from giving inaccurate medical advice to reaffirming user's false beliefs, the study found. The findings raise further questions over the trustworthiness of AI models, which are often deliberately designed to be warm and human-like in order to increase engagement. Such concerns are accentuated by AI chatbots being used for support and even intimacy, as developers seek to broaden their appeal.

An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image82 recognition at scale.

We investigate the degree to which our conditional independence assumption is satisfied empirically in the datasets used in the paper. Specifically, of interest is the assumption of conditional independence of m(x) and h(x), given y. Assessing conditional independence is not straightforward given that m(x) is a K-dimensional real-valued vector and h(x) and yeach take one of K categorical values, with K = 10 for CIFAR-10H and K = 16 for ImageNet-16H. While there exist statistical tests for assessing conditional independence for categorical random variables, with real-valued variables the situation is less straightforward and there are multiple options such as different non-parametric tests involving different tradeoffs [Runge, 2018, Marx and Vreeken, 2019, Mukherjee et al., 2020, Berrett et al., 2020]. Given these issues we investigate the degree of conditional dependence using two relatively simple approaches. The first approach looks at the conditional mutual information (CMI) between the predicted label from the model and the predicted label from the human, conditioned on the true label.

Machine learning models can frequently produce systematic errors on critical subsets (or slices) of data that share common attributes. Discovering and explaining such model bugs is crucial for reliable model deployment. However, existing bug discovery and interpretation methods usually involve heavy human intervention and annotation, which can be cumbersome and have low bug coverage. In this paper, we propose HiBug, an automated framework for interpretable model debugging. Our approach utilizes large pre-trained models, such as chatGPT, to suggest human-understandable attributes that are related to the targeted computer vision tasks. By leveraging pre-trained vision-language models, we can efficiently identify common visual attributes of underperforming data slices using humanunderstandable terms. This enables us to uncover rare cases in the training data, identify spurious correlations in the model, and use the interpretable debug results to select or generate new training data for model improvement. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of the HiBug framework. Code is available at: https://github.com/cure-lab/HiBug.